About Brittany-Ann
Brittany-Ann is a proud, self-identified feminist with fictional tendencies. She currently writes for LouisvilleKY.com and moderates at My Fault I'm Female.
She smokes camels, reads Dumas, and navigates a conservative state as "one of them darn liberals."
About the BookishBeemer:
Brittany-Ann is a freelance writer from Louisville, Kentucky. She writes about politics, current events, culture, and feminism.
When she's not writing or keeping up on current events, she's reading historical fiction, fantasy, and literature, hence the "bookish" part of her handle.
Beemer is a nickname given her by loved ones.
Archives
- February 2014 (1)
- June 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (3)
- November 2012 (1)
- October 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (4)
- April 2012 (17)
- March 2012 (38)
- February 2012 (33)
- January 2012 (20)
- December 2011 (4)
- November 2011 (6)
- October 2011 (4)
- August 2011 (2)
- July 2011 (2)
- June 2011 (3)
- May 2011 (6)
- April 2011 (17)
- March 2011 (6)
- February 2011 (6)
- January 2011 (9)
- December 2010 (15)
- November 2010 (5)
- October 2010 (7)
- September 2010 (2)
- August 2010 (11)
- July 2010 (9)
- June 2010 (10)
- May 2010 (2)
- April 2010 (9)
- March 2010 (8)
- February 2010 (12)
- November 2009 (1)
Blogroll
- Barefoot and Progressive
- Captain Awkward
- Clarissa's Blog
- Commandments of Men
- Every Saturday Morning
- Fallen From Grace
- Feministe
- Holly Pervocracy
- Liberal Simplicity
- Love, Joy, Feminism
- Motivated Grammar
- My Fault, I’m Female
- No Longer Quivering
- Once Jaded, Twice Snarked
- Razing Ruth
- Shakesville
- The Pulse of the City
- Womanist-Musings
Join 253 other subscribers
Update on NYT ‘Truth Vigilantes’ Post
January 13, 2012 Leave a comment
Apparently, Arthur Brisbane thinks we’re all a bunch of idiots. He writes another column, which basically says “No! Wait! You misunderstood me! I asked [same question in previous column]!”
No really, Arthur, we got it. We understand.
What I didn’t cover in the last post is how the ‘Truth Vigilantes’ column’s comment section was shut down after 252 comments.
Most of us are veterans of the internet by now, and we all know what that means. Arthur didn’t like what commenters were saying, so the comments were closed.
It happened in the update, too, after only 46 comments.
It’s been my experience that news sites rarely close comments, even when the conversation degenerates to bigotry, insults, or is derailed by trolls. So, that’s an indicator of their barometer. These two columns are two instances where commenters on a mainstream news website agree, the conversation stays focused, and mostly civil (barring a few throwing insults regarding the author’s intelligence). Frankly, it’s amazing. I’ve never seen the like before.
I suppose this answers my question in my previous post–this isn’t a legitimate inquiry after all.
Liked this post? Pass it on:
Filed under News & Commentary, writing Tagged with Arthur S. Brisbane, comments, journalism, New York Times, the new york times, this is a first on the internetz