About the BookishBeemer:
Brittany-Ann is a freelance writer from Louisville, Kentucky. She writes about politics, current events, culture, and feminism.
When she's not writing or keeping up on current events, she's reading historical fiction, fantasy, and literature, hence the "bookish" part of her handle.
Beemer is a nickname given her by loved ones.
Archives
- February 2014 (1)
- June 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (3)
- November 2012 (1)
- October 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (4)
- April 2012 (17)
- March 2012 (38)
- February 2012 (33)
- January 2012 (20)
- December 2011 (4)
- November 2011 (6)
- October 2011 (4)
- August 2011 (2)
- July 2011 (2)
- June 2011 (3)
- May 2011 (6)
- April 2011 (17)
- March 2011 (6)
- February 2011 (6)
- January 2011 (9)
- December 2010 (15)
- November 2010 (5)
- October 2010 (7)
- September 2010 (2)
- August 2010 (11)
- July 2010 (9)
- June 2010 (10)
- May 2010 (2)
- April 2010 (9)
- March 2010 (8)
- February 2010 (12)
- November 2009 (1)
Blogroll
- Barefoot and Progressive
- Captain Awkward
- Clarissa's Blog
- Commandments of Men
- Every Saturday Morning
- Fallen From Grace
- Feministe
- Holly Pervocracy
- Liberal Simplicity
- Love, Joy, Feminism
- Motivated Grammar
- My Fault, I’m Female
- No Longer Quivering
- Once Jaded, Twice Snarked
- Razing Ruth
- Shakesville
- The Pulse of the City
- Womanist-Musings
Join 253 other subscribers
Supreme Court Decides on Westboro Baptist Church Case
March 2, 2011 3 Comments
Earlier today, the Supreme Court (U.S.) released its decision on Snyder v. Phelps. This is the case where Snyder, the father of a fallen Marine, sued Fred Phelps and Westboro Baptist Church for picketing his son’s funeral.
The Supreme Court decided in favor of the Phelpses.
Having read the decision, the decision in favor of Westboro troubles me. It seems that the Court has taken the easy way out (though undoubtedly unpopular).
Firstly, it does not even consider Westboro’s actions as harassing, only as “speech on broad public issues.” Secondly, it holds that the signs that specifically target Lance Corporal Snyder and his family were irrelevant, because their overall message was one speaking of “moral” and “religious” issues. The Court also holds that since the protest was on public property, complying with police orders, and out of sight of the church itself, that while the protest was scheduled and located to be in the same place and time as Lance Corporal Snyder’s funeral, it was not intentionally causing emotional distress. Thirdly, they did not consider a posting by a member of Westboro post-funeral that personally attacked Matthew and his parents, (though it was brought up at trial) which would prove that the protest was not public commentary, but rather a personal attack. (Since apparently, the signs were not enough. I won’t quote them here, because they’re triggering and hateful, but if you wish to know, some are mentioned in the New York Times article, and most in the Court’s decision itself.)
Justice Alito was the sole dissenter, and wrote a very good opinion. I urge you to read it, even if you’re not interested in reading the entire decision, which is thirty-six pages long. Alito’s dissent begins on page twenty-three of the PDF.
Here are some excerpts from Alito’s dissent:
Filed under News & Commentary, politics Tagged with first amendment, harassment, Matthew Snyder, Snyder v Phelps, Supreme Court, Westboro Baptist Church